According to Sky Sports, the trio have been granted permission to pursue a direct appeal after a judge certified that an “important legal issue in the case” should be decided by the UK’s highest court.
The move comes as Ecclestone, FOM and the FIA continue trying to prevent Massa’s claim over the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix scandal from reaching a full trial.
The former Ferrari driver is seeking damages over the handling of the race, which he argues ultimately cost him the 2008 Formula 1 world championship after he lost the title to Lewis Hamilton by one point.
A previous High Court ruling allowed Massa to continue with a claim alleging unlawful means conspiracy, but rejected his attempt to obtain a declaration that he should have been recognised as the 2008 world champion.
Ecclestone, FOM and the FIA were later ordered to pay Massa £250,000 ($475,000 AUD) as part of the costs connected to earlier applications in the case.
The Supreme Court appeal now gives the defendants another opportunity to challenge whether Massa’s remaining claim should proceed to trial.
Secure your spot today.
Massa’s case centres on the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix, where Renault ordered Nelson Piquet Jr to crash deliberately in order to trigger a safety car and benefit team-mate Fernando Alonso.
Massa had been leading before the safety car period, but Ferrari’s pit stop error saw him released with the fuel hose still attached, ruining his race and leaving him outside the points.
Hamilton finished third in Singapore and went on to win the championship by a single point at the season-ending Brazilian Grand Prix.
The scandal only became public in 2009 when Piquet revealed he had been instructed to crash, leading to punishment for Renault over its role in the incident.
Massa’s legal team argues Ecclestone and the FIA knew about the deliberate crash before the end of the 2008 season and failed to properly investigate it at the time.
Ecclestone has previously maintained he and then-FIA president Max Mosley did not know the crash was deliberate until 2009.
Discussion about this post